When you sling rocks up in the air they're gonna come back. If you're a politician throwing lies about, they'll come back like homing pigeon's and coat you with muck for all to see. So, what's happening in New Zealand?

How much heat could Ardern have stood?

Does Luxon stand a chance?

Have the Greens turned to silage?

Does Act have an Act to show?

Winston? Knock, knock, Winston, Helloooooo...?

For too long, politicians have been accepted by the people as some of the most prolific liars on the planet. Jacinda Ardern said she would never lie and stated so to the public when she contested for office of Prime Minister in New Zealand 2017, "you can be a politician and never have to lie". That was her first lie, many followed and many more will flow from her mouth as long as she's PM.

Jacinda Ardern:

Her time in office is well past her use by date. She with her incompetent minions have done a good job at destroying New Zealand. The loud angry voices of the people in the city squares, cannot be heard because the media have been ordered to suppress what the public doing, saying and protesting about... "Get Out!"

Based on the performance of Ardern, a collapsed economy, housing and health services under enormous pressure, failed promises and wait, 'a photo shoot', my assessment or prediction for her blowhard BS and arrogance, is that the wind is gone from her sails and she was a sitting duck in a pond surrounded by seasonal duck hunters. Her body guard's may have been going off sick so they could read the classifieds for other work.

In other words she had no ability to sustain her position as the leader of a broken and dysfunctional group of MP's who have as much skill as blind mice in a maze, trying to please the cat so it's sharp fangs didn't snap at them.

Jacinda Kate Laurell Ardern's time was well overdue. She should have left the building before January 2023. Her profile shows there were major issues and dangers escalating and decisions had to be made, and January 2023, D Day, an ending, so there you have it. But whether or not she had any influence or made any significant changes by her stepping down, the elections of 2023 are looming, her life had been a series of shock and horror stories and the last months of 2022 and the four months following, through to April were due to be very testing times. Was she Red Sticker'ed? "On the bench, get out of the game!" But who gave the order Hmm?

Chris Luxon:

The opposition, Luxon, destroyer of Air New Zealand? Things have picked up in the airline since he scuttled the ship. Luxon is in for a very difficult 2023, the shine will have dulled on his unfertilized crown. 2023 finds him under huge stress and as 2024 rolls in, he's likely to roll on out as his hospital pulse monitor looks like it could be about to flat-liner. "Beeeeeeep".

Grant Robertson:

He had a difficult time in December before 2023 hit.

He had a new opportunity in January but this soon dulled in February, in fact the whole year will find him achieving very little, or very little, "Oops", did I say that twice?  So, February, July and September before the elections, and then again in November, the wind goes from his sails and he'll drift along for a couple more years then... "who was Grant Robertson"?

Chris Hipkins:

Strange things are happening with this high school prefect. November and December brought surprising news (not so surprising as he knew what was coming), then things repeated in January and February as the year started. It is like he was told of what was happening but had to play out the act for Ardern, as what was about to be sprung on the public had to look sincere. February and March have brought a huge weight on his shoulders and it is not till April he gets a breath of fresh air but this does not last long at all. May, June, July August are not easy at all so he is in for a rough year, not only that, October and November are like a boxing ring fight that leaves him exhausted come the end of 2023.

Megan Woods:

She is known by other names, but she did not like the personal hits she heard in December last about the leadership change (Oops!), this shock news rolled on into January and February this year. She has a quick mind, guards her sensitivity, but come election time in October, her happy days of holding onto Ardern's skirt tails as she used to are gone, all alone now. She may stay in politics as it has good pay, but her days of glory and selfies she had with her boss are gone forever.

NATIONAL or LABOUR, or someone else...

Remember Chris Luxon, was the CEO of Air New Zealand? Well, 2023 is not looking good for him or his party.  The National Airline was in a financial mess and he was the Master-chief. I predicted accurately he was being groomed for the position to lead the National Party. But, he lied to the people about our national airline and how bad it was. His soft excuse and to 'come clean' to the New Zealand public, does not excuse his outright dishonesty, but a politician seems duty bound to lie, so maybe he fits the bill, but will likely get less voters support than he's hoping for.

Nicola Willis, his deputy leader is really pushing hard in 2023 to keep a strong hold on the wheel of a sailing ship in an series of storms throughout the year, navigating her way through but there are too many challenges. January, March, May, then October and December will find her in a state of exhaustion. If 2023 was not bad enough, 2024 sucks for her.

Labour Party:

Remember, they "never lie and are the only source of truth", said Jacinda Ardern. Well that was a stupid comment because it was an outright lie from the get-go. Maybe she practiced her speeches in front of a mirror and learnt from her image that telling porkies is fine as it comes with practice. Her team of obedient minions do not have the strength in their numbers to manage an overwhelming assault in the 2023 elections. Too bad, how sad, never mind.

And ACT, David Seymour:

Now this is interesting. For the last two years, Seymour's Party and it's leader have been making headwind and their numbers have swelled. Looking at his Profile and predicting the road ahead for him looks very clear.  Two months after his birthday in June 2022, the skies cleared away many of the stormy clouds he has been burdened by for many years and he is making up for lost time.

April and May in 2023 have a few hurdles to get over, but come election time he is not suffering the same challenges I see the other Parties experiencing. Is it possible he (like Winston Peters used to be0, is a King Maker at the 2023 elections? I say yes. This is a big and welcoming change for New Zealand politics. Even after the elections, David Seymour is not wearing war wound bandages like the other parties MP's. So, based on the numbers ahead as I see them, Seymour is in my books the best contender and we don't have to worry about the, "Green Party". The Green party are turning to compost and need digging into the soil. The right place for rotten veggies.

James Shaw is having a very difficult time in 2023, yeah, and so what? So are most New Zealander's. This party along with the Labour party have done a dirty job and destroyed our beautiful country. None of them in my opinion are fit for purpose. Well, someone's got to say it. I did my research beyond the standard press, radio stations and television networks where everything has been suppressed. Don't forget; Ardern's words "We are the only source of truth" and that was just the beginning of an absolute and blatant series of lies.

2023 will be a very difficult year for us in New Zealand and much of the research I have done and the predictions I see show that we all have to get ready and prepare as 2023 carries a nasty series of circumstances.

Want to know more for yourself, your family and business?

Visit www.petervaughan.net and request more info or a personal forecast.

Take care,

Peter Vaughan 

Counterspin Media in Court, but why? According to the MSM feeds, Counterspin supports conspiracy theories.

Yet an International Lawyer, Amy Benjamin, believes Counterspin is standing for the NZ people. Is there something we are not aware of that is being suppressed or hidden?

According to news feeds, Kelvin and Hannah, Pictured [Photo by George Heard - @NZherald] are accused of having distributed suppressed images or film footage of the infamous Mosque attack in Christchurch in 2019.

The content of the footage, reportedly taken by Brenton Tarrant, has been a hot topic of International media, lawyers (Amy Benjamin USA et-al), and senior investigators from overseas. They feel the "shooting" was a false flag, but why?

The footage was suppressed by order of Jacinda Ardern almost directly after the massacre, "because it was so graphic and should never be seen by anyone" she said. This is why Tarrant was sentenced to prison in solitary confinement for life, so said the Prime Minister. The heaviest sentence ever in New Zealand's history, but something is not making sense.

Stuff News aired a documentary on August 15, 2022. In the doco a photograph of the crime scene was shown. This photo was never banned or it would not have been published by Stuff News.

The photo shows a group of Muslims milling around IN THE MIDDLE OF A CRIME SCENE! They look relaxed, unconcerned, chatting with two police officers among them. Crime scenes are always cleared of people to preserve any and all evidence. So this scene makes no sense. Remember this is the biggest crime scene ever in New Zealand history.

BUT it gets worse. There is a dead body laying beside them, headless, in the gutter. One of Tarrant's victims and not one of the 14-15 people beside the body in the gutter, are paying any attention to it, not one! What could be weirder than that? Wait there's more.

I recall being shown a picture circulated by Stuff News, not long after the incident. This photo would have been taken at the very same time and place as the one in the recent Stuff News doco. The dead body was a mannequin not a real person? How do I know?

I remember seeing a different shot of the body in the gutter that Tarrant was alleged to have shot twice in the head. It was a female laying in the gutter and it's head was missing. Not blasted all over the place, just missing, no blood? How come? the picture reveals it was a mannequin as the pipe that the display head sits on was protruding from between the shoulders, but what could be worse than that?

This is incredible. A man called Nathan Smith, a victim at the crime scene and a witness in the ensuing court case, was in the picture using the 'headless body' as an arm rest as he talked casually to another person. I'd forgotten this till I saw the picture in Stuff News doco. I now believe Kelvin Alp has a valid point.

This Mosque shooting looks like a conspiracy, not a theory. It looks staged. Nothing makes sense. Stuff news must have known about this. Now they have potentially shot themselves in the foot. This needs disclosure and investigation and this is possibly what Kelvin was trying to bring into the open.

If that is so, then it raises serious questions. Counterspin Media have tried to reveal a Government cover up. This would certainly place the Prime Minister in a very precarious situation.  Did she know? She must have as nothing this big can happen without her being fully informed. But what for?

The pictures and documentary Stuff News produced and aired on public media, appears to be an attempt to down-play and shame Kelvin Alp. Stuff News have exposed evidence, key evidence, a Smoking Gun! This has to be investigated.

This also poses another crucial question, is Stuff News involved in this? They took the pictures and they released them. That was their mistake. Kelvin may have opened a can of worms the Government would not want exposed. Too late it seems, Stuff News has inadvertently helped Kelvin. New Zealand is waking up.

I truly hope Kelvin and Hannah are being looked after. Where are our Lawyers in this country? Is it only New Zealand citizens doing what professionals should be digging into. This is 'BREAKING' Head-Line news! One of the biggest crimes in modern history.

Jacinda Ardern, "I will never tell a lie"

Politicians lie right in your face

As a youngster I stood directly in front of people and though their focus was directed at me, I was invisible. I reckon politicians would love to be able to do that. But how did I do that trick?

As a kid growing up I loved watching magic tricks, but I knew it was not real. Seeing a woman cut in half on a stage was a stage act, entertainment, a 'magic trick', yet people covered their mouths in horror and squirmed. They weren't being lied to, they were watching a skilled artist. No harm done.

My youth involved my being a weekend cinema goer and I ended up working there in the evenings, even became a projectionist, it was wonderful. I discovered I could go right behind the screen during movies and look at the audience through the perforated white canvas. I saw them but they couldn't see me.

The people's eyes seemed to be on me, it was like a one-way mirror, it was such fun. Yet it fascinated me how people reacted to things on the silver screen that weren't real. Then one day I saw the film "Wag the Dog", it stared Dustin Hoffman, one of my favourite actors.

Its on the television, it must be true

Hoffman's character was a film producer engaged by government secret agents to make a fake war for television to gaslight the people of America into believing the war was real. The purpose, to secure the President from losing the election so he could remain in office. The multiple war scenes were broadcast, the people fooled, the President stayed in office, then they ended the war.

The war was a fake, people bought it, they believed there was a war, then it ended as quickly as it began. The election secured and the people were fooled.

Do you think this could happen in today's world? It has been said many times, if you own the media, you control the people, and when you have the people in your clutches doing all you bid them do, you own the country, perhaps the world.

Media power

Propaganda, well presented in another great film by yet another famous actor Robin Williams in the box office hit "Good Morning Vietnam", where the media was controlled to hide the truth. It is possible? Does this really happen? Yes. When people cry out "Conspiracy" to the government, the media broadcast that the people are conspiracy theorists, that is until they are caught, then the conspiracy is revealed, the government lied. Time and again conspiracies are planned, and people die.

Climate change - real or fake?

Like comparing a pea to a basketball, earth is tiny against the sun. At 151 million kilometres away the intense light and the heat the sun provides, powers the earth. All industry, human's and living organisms, producing gasses that are no match against the approximate 1800 active volcano emissions spewing out above and below the oceans.

We can't cap volcanoes and living creatures don't compare diddly squat to mega farting volcanoes. It's all about tax! 'Paid off' scientist are told to ignore the sun, programme their computer models to follow the government narratives, but the true scientists will bluntly look you in the eye and say "the sun controls the climate' it always has, it always will"!  Conspirators don't want you to know this, it buggers their plan.

Emissions from the manufacturing of electric cars, far outweighs fossil fuelled vehicles, including their manufacture and years of running on petroleum fuels hands down!  So what is the truth?  The truth is the government tells lies and even our local main stream media with its award winning morning radio host, Mike Hosking, has said exactly that, Ardern and her government are lying.

One last matter

And, it's carbon dioxide (not carbon) from fires, exhausts and volcanoes that makes plants grow so we can eat. Biology 1-01, and there's a big difference between Carbon (and) Carbon dioxide. The gas does not float up and become a climate hazard, it's heavy, lies on the ground, gets absorbed by the soil and the ocean, plants utilise it for existence as we use oxygen for existence.

Co2 is not toxic, nor is nitrogen as they are telling us it is. Both gasses are essential to plant growth. Nitrogen is 70% of the air we breathe and we're not suffering. Vile propaganda and lies spew from the governments mouths to create fear in the people so they will do the government's bidding.

Remember this: The image of Jacinda Ardern is of a person who publicly stated to the nation in her election debate; "I will never lie - I believe you can be a politician and never tell a lie". She lied about lying and she still does it. She is not trustworthy and she controls the media!